Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery
dc.contributor.author | Damen, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Spilsbury, Katrina | |
dc.contributor.author | Levitt, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Makin, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Salama, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Penter, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Platell, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T10:49:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T10:49:34Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-11-11T20:00:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Damen, N. and Spilsbury, K. and Levitt, M. and Makin, G. and Salama, P. and Tan, P. and Penter, C. et al. 2014. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 84 (10): pp. 763-768. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5956 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ans.12494 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Anastomotic leaks are a serious complication of bowel surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the rate and severity, and identify risk factors for leaks in patients undergoing bowel anastomoses. Methods: Prospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing bowel surgery within a colorectal surgical unit. Anastomotic leak was defined and graded according to severity. A nurse independently collected the information. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: Two thousand three hundred and sixty-three patients underwent 2994 anastomoses. Their median age was 64 years. Seven per cent were emergency operations. Anastomotic leak occurred in 82 patients (2.7%). Sixty-three per cent of leaks were managed with drainage or re-operation. Ultra-low anterior resection (ULAR) was associated with the highest subgroup leak rate (7.3%). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors for a leak included ‘other’ pathologies (iatrogenic injury, ischaemia, radiation enteritis) (P = 0.016, odds ratio (OR): 6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4–28.0), ULAR (P = 0.001, OR: 8.5, 95% CI: 2.3–31.2) and the surgeon (A: P < 0.001, OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.1–5.6). Conclusion: Majority of predictors for anastomotic leak were fairly intuitive. Nonetheless, it was relevant to note the importance of the individual surgeon as an independent predictor for leaks. | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons | |
dc.subject | inflammatory bowel diseases | |
dc.subject | intestinal neoplasm | |
dc.subject | anastomotic leak | |
dc.subject | colorectal surgery | |
dc.subject | effect modifier | |
dc.title | Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 84 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 763 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 768 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1445-2197 | |
dcterms.source.title | ANZ Journal of Surgery | |
curtin.note |
This is the accepted version of the following article: Damen, N. and Spilsbury, K. and Levitt, M. and Makin, G. and Salama, P. and Tan, P. and Penter, C. et al. 2014. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 84 (10): pp. 763-768, which has been published in final form at | |
curtin.department | Centre for Population Health | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |