Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRegan, Annette
dc.contributor.authorBloomfield, L.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, I.
dc.contributor.authorEffler, P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T05:20:21Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T05:20:21Z
dc.date.created2018-02-01T04:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationRegan, A. and Bloomfield, L. and Peters, I. and Effler, P. 2017. Randomized controlled trial of text message reminders for increasing influenza vaccination. Annals of Family Medicine. 15 (6): pp. 507-514.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61861
dc.identifier.doi10.1370/afm.2120
dc.description.abstract

© 2017, Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. PURPOSE Seasonal influenza vaccine is recommended and funded for groups at higher risk of serious infection, but uptake is suboptimal. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of short message service (SMS) reminders for influenza vaccination. METHODS Six weeks after seasonal influenza vaccinations began, we identified high-risk patients who had a mobile telephone number on record at 10 practices in Western Australia. Thirty-two percent of the selected patients had already been vaccinated in the current year and were ineligible. Of the remaining 12,354 eligible patients at each practice one-half were randomly assigned to receive a vaccination reminder by SMS (intervention) and the rest received no SMS (con-trol). Approximately 3 months after the SMS was sent (the study period), vaccination data were extracted from the patients’ electronic medical records. Log-bino-mial regression models were used to calculate the relative risk (RR) of vaccination between the intervention and control group. RESULTS Twelve-percent (769 of 6,177) of the intervention group and 9% (548 of 6,177) of the control group were vaccinated during the study period, a 39% relative increase attributable to the SMS (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54). For every 29 SMSs sent, costing $3.48, 1 additional high-risk patient was immunized. The greatest effect was observed for children younger than 5 years, whose parents were more than twice as likely to have their child vaccinated if they received a SMS reminder (RR = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.79-3.29). CONCLUSION We found S MS reminders to be a modestly effective, low-cost means to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage among high-risk patients.

dc.titleRandomized controlled trial of text message reminders for increasing influenza vaccination
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume15
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage507
dcterms.source.endPage514
dcterms.source.issn1544-1709
dcterms.source.titleAnnals of Family Medicine
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record