Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, Jo
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T06:15:12Z
dc.date.available2018-02-06T06:15:12Z
dc.date.created2018-02-06T05:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJones, J. 2017. The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?. English in Australia. 52 (2): pp. 65-70.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63069
dc.description.abstract

© 2017, AATE - Australian Association Teaching English. All rights reserved. This essay expresses a profoundly ambivalent response to the legacy of Dartmouth, particularly Dixon’s ‘Growth’ Model of English. English educators owe a debt to Dixon in terms of innovative pedagogical methods that are part of the daily shapes of tertiary and high school English classes, including the way drama and performance invoke excitement and engagement, and the advantages of energised spoken formats used to debate issues and discuss texts. On the other hand some of Dartmouth’s key conceptual and methodological tenets, as they have played out over the decades, have become counter-productive elements of English teaching in the twenty-first century. Here, a final-year tertiary teacher education course - ‘Teaching, Literature, Culture’ - is used to challenge the dimensions of the Growth Model as they manifest in the present time.

dc.publisherAATE
dc.titleThe ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume52
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage65
dcterms.source.endPage70
dcterms.source.issn0046-208X
dcterms.source.titleEnglish in Australia
curtin.departmentDepartment of Communication and Cultural Studies
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record