Who Approves Fraudulence? Configurational Causes of Consumers’ Unethical Judgments
MetadataShow full item record
© 2017 The Author(s) Corrupt behavior presents major challenges for organizations in a wide range of settings. This article embraces a complexity theoretical perspective to elucidate the causal patterns of factors underlying consumers’ unethical judgments. This study examines how causal conditions of four distinct domains combine into configurational causes of unethical judgments of two frequent forms of corrupt consumer behavior: shoplifting and fare dodging. The findings of fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analyses indicate alternative, consistently sufficient “recipes” for the outcomes of interest. This study extends prior work on the topic by offering new insights into the interplay and the interconnected structures of multiple causal factors and by describing configurational causes of consumers’ ethical evaluations of corrupt behaviors. This knowledge may support practitioners and policy makers to develop education and control approaches to thwart corrupt consumer behaviors.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dr Google and the consumer: A qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditionsLee, Kenny; Hoti, Kreshnik; Hughes, Jeff; Emmerton, Lynne (2014)Background: The abundance of health information available online provides consumers with greater access to information pertinent to the management of health conditions. This is particularly important given an increasing ...
Making a new democracy work: the role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in combating corruption during democratic transition in IndonesiaSetiyono, Budi (2010)Corruption has often stimulated the collapse of authoritarian regimes and was followed by democratisation in a number of developing countries. Many new democratic regimes, however, have also been failed to control corruption ...
Be Careful Where You Smile: Culture Shapes Judgments of Intelligence and Honesty of Smiling IndividualsKrys, K.; Vauclair, C.-M.; Capaldi, C.; Lun, V.; Bond, M.; Domínguez-Espinosa, A.; Torres, C.; Lipp, Ottmar; Manickam, L.; Xing, C.; Antalíková, R.; Pavlopoulos, V.; Teyssier, J.; Hur, T.; Hansen, K.; Szarota, P.; Ahmed, R.; Burtceva, E.; Chkhaidze, A.; Cenko, E.; Denoux, P.; Fülöp, M.; Hassan, A.; Igbokwe, D.; Isik, I.; Javangwe, G.; Malbran, M.; Maricchiolo, F.; Mikarsa, H.; Miles, L.; Nader, M.; Park, J.; Rizwan, M.; Salem, R.; Schwarz, B.; Shah, I.; Sun, C.; van Tilburg, W.; Wagner, W.; Wise, R.; Yu, A. (2015)Smiling individuals are usually perceived more favorably than non-smiling ones—they are judged as happier, more attractive, competent, and friendly. These seemingly clear and obvious consequences of smiling are assumed ...