Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study
MetadataShow full item record
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common cardiac procedure used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. Patient-centred care is a priority in cardiovascular health having been shown to increase patient satisfaction, engagement with rehabilitation activities and reduce anxiety. Evidence indicates that patient-centred care is best achieved by routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have limited the patient involvement in their development. Aims: To identify and explore outcomes, patients perceive as important following PCI. Methods: A qualitative design was adopted. Eight focus groups and five semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients who had undergone PCI in the previous 6 months. Outcomes were identified and mapped under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) patient-reported outcome (PROs) domains of feeling (physical and psychological outcomes), function and evaluation. Inductive and deductive analysis methods were used with open, axial and thematic coding. Results: Consistent with prior studies, patients identified feeling and function outcomes such as reductions in physical and psychological symptoms and the ability to perform usual activities as important. Participants also identified a range of new outcomes, including confidence to return to usual activities and evaluation domains such as adverse effects of medications and the importance of patient communication. Conclusion: The findings of this research should be considered in the design of a cardiac PROM for PCI patients. A PROM which adequately assesses these outcomes can provide clinicians and hospital staff with a foundation in which to address these concerns or symptoms.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The Spine Functional Index: development and clinimetric validation of a new whole-spine functional outcome measureGabel, C.; Melloh, Markus; Burkett, B.; Michener, L. (2013)Background context: Most spine patient-reported outcome measures are divided into neck and back subregions. This prevents their use in the assessment of the whole spine. By contrast, whole-spine patient-reported outcome ...
Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysisHuijbregts, H.; Khan, R.; Sorensen, E.; Fick, Daniel; Haebich, S. (2016)© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation.Background and purpose — Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been introduced to ...
Do patients have a say? A narrative review of the development of patient-reported outcome measures used in elective procedures for coronary revascularisationPeeters, G.; Barker, A.; Talevski, J.; Ackerman, I.; Ayton, D.; Reid, Christopher; Evans, S.; Stoelwinder, J.; McNeil, J. (2018)© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture health information from the patient’s perspective that can be used when weighing up benefits, ...