Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUnsworth, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, M.
dc.contributor.authorSwinton, L.
dc.contributor.authorCole, H.
dc.contributor.authorSarigiannis, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:54:50Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:54:50Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationUnsworth, C. and Coulson, M. and Swinton, L. and Cole, H. and Sarigiannis, M. 2015. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Disability and Rehabilitation. 37 (11): pp. 997-1003.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6711
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/09638288.2014.952450
dc.description.abstract

© 2014 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved. Purpose: Outcome measures must be responsive to change (able to show statistically significant change) and must also produce information on the degree of change that is clinically significant, or the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This research sought to establish the MCID for four domains of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Methods: Using a criterion approach, 30 international clinicians were surveyed about their perceptions of the MCID for AusTOMs-OT. Second, using a distribution-based approach, the MCID was calculated as half of the standard deviation (SD) of the AusTOMs-OT raw scores for a sample of 787 clients. Results: Just over half the clinicians surveyed indicated that a one-point change represented the MCID for AusTOMs-OT for three domains, and 0.5-point change showed MCID for the final domain. The data analysed for the distribution-based calculation indicated that the half SD ranged from 0.51 to 0.61. Conclusion: Using both criterion and distribution-based approaches, this research empirically demonstrated that a change on the four domains of the AusTOMs-OT of between 0.51 and 1 point shows MCID. Considering these findings, and for ease of clinical interpretation, it is recommended that a one-point shift be adopted as the MCID across all domains.Implications for RehabilitationThe AusTOMs-OT have been previously shown to be valid and reliable outcome measures for use with all client groups across all settings including rehabilitation.So that rehabilitation professionals can interpret outcomes data from AusTOMs-OT, information must be available on the degree of change that is clinically significant (also referred to as the minimal clinically important difference or MCID).Using empirical calculations as well as clinician opinion, it is recommended that a one-point shift be used as the minimal clinically important difference for the AusTOMs-OT.

dc.publisherInforma Healthcare
dc.titleDetermination of the minimal clinically important difference on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT)
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume37
dcterms.source.number11
dcterms.source.startPage997
dcterms.source.endPage1003
dcterms.source.issn0963-8288
dcterms.source.titleDisability and Rehabilitation
curtin.departmentSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record