Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGamper, E.
dc.contributor.authorHolzner, B.
dc.contributor.authorKing, M.
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Richard
dc.contributor.authorViney, R.
dc.contributor.authorNerich, V.
dc.contributor.authorKemmler, G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-18T08:00:44Z
dc.date.available2018-05-18T08:00:44Z
dc.date.created2018-05-18T00:22:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGamper, E. and Holzner, B. and King, M. and Norman, R. and Viney, R. and Nerich, V. and Kemmler, G. 2018. Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States. Value in Health.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68081
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012
dc.description.abstract

© 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Background: Recently, a newly developed cancer-specific multiattribute utility instrument based on the widely used health-related quality of life instrument, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, was introduced: the QLU-C10D. For the elicitation of utility weights, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed. Our aim was to investigate the DCE in terms of individual choice consistency and utility estimate consistency by applying a test-retest design. Methods: We conducted the study in general population samples in Germany and France. The DCE was administered via a web-based self-complete survey using online panels. Respondents were presented 16 choice sets comprising 11 attributes with 4 levels each. Retest was conducted 4 to 6 weeks after first assessment. We used kappa and percentage agreement as measures of choice consistency and both intraclass correlations and mean utility differences as measures of utility estimate consistency. Results: A total of 300 German respondents (31% female, mean age 48 years [SD 14]) and 305 French respondents (46% female, mean age 47 years [SD 16] ) completed test and retest assessments. Individual choice consistency was moderate to high (Germany: ? = 0.605, percentage agreement = 80.2%; France: ? = 0.411, percentage agreement = 70.6%). Utility estimate consistency was high when considering intraclass correlations (all > 0.79). Mean utility differences were 0.08 in the German sample and 0.05 in the French sample. Conclusions: Results indicate that the designed DCE elicits stable health state preferences rather than guesses or mood-specific or condition-specific judgments. Nevertheless, the identified mean utility differences between test and retest need to be taken into account when determining minimal important differences for the QLU-C10D in future research.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.titleTest-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1098-3015
dcterms.source.titleValue in Health
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record