Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States
dc.contributor.author | Gamper, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Holzner, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | King, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Norman, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Viney, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nerich, V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kemmler, G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-18T08:00:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-18T08:00:44Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-05-18T00:22:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gamper, E. and Holzner, B. and King, M. and Norman, R. and Viney, R. and Nerich, V. and Kemmler, G. 2018. Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States. Value in Health. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68081 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012 | |
dc.description.abstract |
© 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Background: Recently, a newly developed cancer-specific multiattribute utility instrument based on the widely used health-related quality of life instrument, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, was introduced: the QLU-C10D. For the elicitation of utility weights, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed. Our aim was to investigate the DCE in terms of individual choice consistency and utility estimate consistency by applying a test-retest design. Methods: We conducted the study in general population samples in Germany and France. The DCE was administered via a web-based self-complete survey using online panels. Respondents were presented 16 choice sets comprising 11 attributes with 4 levels each. Retest was conducted 4 to 6 weeks after first assessment. We used kappa and percentage agreement as measures of choice consistency and both intraclass correlations and mean utility differences as measures of utility estimate consistency. Results: A total of 300 German respondents (31% female, mean age 48 years [SD 14]) and 305 French respondents (46% female, mean age 47 years [SD 16] ) completed test and retest assessments. Individual choice consistency was moderate to high (Germany: ? = 0.605, percentage agreement = 80.2%; France: ? = 0.411, percentage agreement = 70.6%). Utility estimate consistency was high when considering intraclass correlations (all > 0.79). Mean utility differences were 0.08 in the German sample and 0.05 in the French sample. Conclusions: Results indicate that the designed DCE elicits stable health state preferences rather than guesses or mood-specific or condition-specific judgments. Nevertheless, the identified mean utility differences between test and retest need to be taken into account when determining minimal important differences for the QLU-C10D in future research. | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | |
dc.title | Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1098-3015 | |
dcterms.source.title | Value in Health | |
curtin.department | School of Public Health | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |