Interactive reading opportunities beyond the early years: What educators need to consider
Access Status
Authors
Date
2017Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
© 2017, © Australian Council for Educational Research 2017. While the benefits of interactive reading opportunities, such as reading aloud and being read to, are well established, little is known about children’s attitudes toward, and perceptions of these practices beyond the early years. Research in this area can inform literacy instruction aimed at encouraging enjoyment and continuance of this practice. The 2016 Western Australian Study in Children’s Book Reading explored the attitudes of children aged 8–11 toward infrequency and cessation of interactive reading, their experiences of interactive reading with siblings, and the social and emotional effects that they felt listening to reading had on them. Children also described what they learned from listening to reading and reading aloud, as well as their attitudes toward reading aloud at school. Interactive reading experiences are complex and diverse social and educational events, with opportunities for shared reading experience related to growth in skill and confidence, and early cessation at home and at school heightening anxiety toward reading aloud.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ledger, S.; Merga, Margaret (2018)Whilst there exists a plethora of research about the benefits of reading aloud on children's literacy development and a range of government reports highlighting the positive investment return on early intervention strategies ...
-
Merga, Margaret; Ledger, S. (2018)© 2018 UKLA Reading aloud to children is considered one of the most highly effective strategies for fostering a range of literacy skills, both at home and within contemporary classrooms. However, little is known about ...
-
Hughes, Angus; Holtrop, Djurre ; Dunlop, Patrick; Steedman, Grace; Chan, Joan (2019)Aim: Between 30-50% of job applicants are thought to ‘fake’ on personality measures, representing a challenge to the validity of these assessments by practitioners in the selection process (Griffith, Chmielowski, & Yoshita, ...