Comparison of Sedentary Behaviors in Office Workers Using Sit-Stand Tables with and Without Semiautomated Position Changes
dc.contributor.author | Barbieri, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mathiassen, Svend | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T12:26:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T12:26:42Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-06-29T12:09:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Barbieri, D. and Srinivasan, D. and Mathiassen, S. and Oliveira, A. 2017. Comparison of Sedentary Behaviors in Office Workers Using Sit-Stand Tables with and Without Semiautomated Position Changes. Human Factors: the journal of the human factors and ergonomics society. 59 (5): pp. 782-795. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68680 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0018720817695771 | |
dc.description.abstract |
© 2017 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Objective: We compared usage patterns of two different electronically controlled sit-stand tables during a 2-month intervention period among office workers. Background: Office workers spend most of their working time sitting, which is likely detrimental to health. Although the introduction of sit-stand tables has been suggested as an effective intervention to decrease sitting time, limited evidence is available on usage patterns of sit-stand tables and whether patterns are influenced by table configuration. Method: Twelve workers were provided with standard sit-stand tables (nonautomated table group) and 12 with semiautomated sit-stand tables programmed to change table position according to a preset pattern, if the user agreed to the system-generated prompt (semiautomated table group). Table position was monitored continuously for 2 months after introducing the tables, as a proxy for sit-stand behavior. Results: On average, the table was in a "sit" position for 85% of the workday in both groups; this percentage did not change significantly during the 2-month period. Switches in table position from sit to stand were, however, more frequent in the semiautomated table group than in the nonautomated table group (0.65 vs. 0.29 hr -1 ; p =.001). Conclusion: Introducing a semiautomated sit-stand table appeared to be an attractive alternative to a standard sit-stand table, because it led to more posture variation. Application: A semiautomated sit-stand table may effectively contribute to making postures more variable among office workers and thus aid in alleviating negative health effects of extensive sitting. | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications, Inc. | |
dc.title | Comparison of Sedentary Behaviors in Office Workers Using Sit-Stand Tables with and Without Semiautomated Position Changes | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 59 | |
dcterms.source.number | 5 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 782 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 795 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0018-7208 | |
dcterms.source.title | Human Factors: the journal of the human factors and ergonomics society | |
curtin.department | School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |