Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, J.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Ted
dc.contributor.authorStout, R.
dc.contributor.authorZlotnick, C.
dc.contributor.authorCerbo, L.
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, J.
dc.contributor.authorWiltsey-Stirman, S.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T12:26:47Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T12:26:47Z
dc.date.created2018-06-29T12:08:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, J. and Miller, T. and Stout, R. and Zlotnick, C. and Cerbo, L. and Andrade, J. and Wiltsey-Stirman, S. 2016. Study protocol: Hybrid Type I cost-effectiveness and implementation study of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for men and women prisoners with major depression. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 47: pp. 266-274.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68720
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.013
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 Elsevier Inc. Purpose: This article describes the protocol for a Hybrid Type I cost-effectiveness and implementation study of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for men and women prisoners with major depressive disorder (MDD). The goal is to promote uptake of evidence-based treatments in criminal justice settings by conducting a randomized effectiveness study that collects implementation data, including a full cost-effectiveness analysis. Background: More than 2.3 million people are incarcerated in the United States on any given day. MDD is the most common severe mental illness among incarcerated individuals. Despite the prevalence and consequences of MDD among incarcerated populations, this study will be the first fully-powered randomized trial of any treatment for MDD in an incarcerated population. Design: Given the politically charged nature of the justice system, advantageous health outcomes are often not enough to get an intervention implemented in prisons. To increase the policy impact of this trial, we sought advice from prison providers and administrators about outcomes that would be persuasive to policy-makers and defensible to the public. In this trial, effectiveness questions will be answered using a randomized clinical trial design comparing IPT plus prison treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone, with outcomes including depressive symptoms (primary), suicidality, and in prison functioning (enrollment and completion of correctional programs; disciplinary and incident reports; aggression/victimization; social support). Implementation outcomes will include cost-effectiveness; feasibility and acceptability of IPT to clients, providers, and administrators; prison provider intervention fidelity, attitudes, and competencies; and barriers and facilitators of implementation assessed through surveys, interviews, and process notes.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.titleStudy protocol: Hybrid Type I cost-effectiveness and implementation study of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for men and women prisoners with major depression
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume47
dcterms.source.startPage266
dcterms.source.endPage274
dcterms.source.issn1551-7144
dcterms.source.titleContemporary Clinical Trials
curtin.departmentCentre for Population Health Research
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record