Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrask, C.
dc.contributor.authorMathiassen, Svend
dc.contributor.authorRostami, M.
dc.contributor.authorHeiden, M.
dc.identifier.citationTrask, C. and Mathiassen, S. and Rostami, M. and Heiden, M. 2017. Observer variability in posture assessment from video recordings: The effect of partly visible periods. Applied Ergonomics. 60: pp. 275-281.

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd Observers rank partly visible postures on video frames differently than fully visible postures, but it's not clear if this is due to differences in observer perception. This study investigated the effect of posture visibility on between-observer variability in assessments of trunk and arm posture. Trained observers assessed trunk and arm postures from video recordings of 84 pulp mill shifts using a work sampling approach; postures were also categorized as ‘fully’ or ‘partly’ visible. Between-worker, between-day, and between-observer variance components and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated. Although no consistent gradient was seen for the trunk, right upper arm posture showed smaller between-observer variance when all observers rated a posture as fully visible. This suggests that, partly-visible data, especially when observers disagree as to the level of visibility, introduces more between-observer variability when compared to fully visible data. Some previously-identified differences in daily posture summaries may be related to this phenomenon.

dc.titleObserver variability in posture assessment from video recordings: The effect of partly visible periods
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleApplied Ergonomics
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record