Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorton, K.
dc.contributor.authorMcClelland, C.
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Mark
dc.identifier.citationHorton, K. and McClelland, C. and Griffin, M. 2014. Defined by our hierarchy? How hierarchical positions shape our identifications and well-being at work. Human Relations.. 67 (10): pp. 1167-1188.

© The Author(s) 2014. We explore the influence of hierarchy on workers’ identification and well-being. Specifically, we hypothesize that the accessibility of different identity targets will vary according to the distinct priorities and perspectives found at different hierarchical levels, and that this will have implications for the identification and well-being of workers operating in these different positions. Testing our predictions in a sample of 789 naval personnel we find strong support for our hypotheses. Specifically, we find that individuals in operational positions identify strongly with their career and functional workgroups and that these attachments are important in predicting their affective well-being. In contrast, the identifications and well-being of personnel in mid-level and strategic positions are more strongly tied to career and organizational identities respectively. This research provides new insights into the nature and impact of patterns of identification in the workplace, with important theoretical and practical implications for the affective well-being of workers.

dc.publisherPlenum Publishing Corporation
dc.titleDefined by our hierarchy? How hierarchical positions shape our identifications and well-being at work
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleHuman Relations.
curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record