Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoward, J.
dc.contributor.authorGagné, Marylène
dc.contributor.authorBureau, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-08T04:41:57Z
dc.date.available2018-08-08T04:41:57Z
dc.date.created2018-08-08T03:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationHoward, J. and Gagné, M. and Bureau, J. 2017. Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 143 (12): pp. 1346-1377.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69700
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/bul0000125
dc.description.abstract

Self-determination theory proposes a multidimensional representation of motivation comprised of several factors said to fall along a continuum of relative autonomy. The current meta-analysis examined the relationships between these motivation factors in order to demonstrate how reliably they conformed to a predictable continuum-like pattern. Based on data from 486 samples representing over 205,000 participants who completed 1 of 13 validated motivation scales, the results largely supported a continuum-like structure of motivation and indicate that self-determination is central in explaining human motivation. Further examination of heterogeneity indicated that while regulations were predictably ordered across domains and scales, the exact distance between subscales varied across samples in a way that was not explainable by a set of moderators. Results did not support the inclusion of integrated regulation or the 3 subscales of intrinsic motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation to know, to experience stimulation, and to achieve) due to excessively high interfactor correlations and overlapping confidence intervals. Recommendations for scale refinements and the scoring of motivation are provided.

dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.titleTesting a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume143
dcterms.source.number12
dcterms.source.startPage1346
dcterms.source.endPage1377
dcterms.source.issn0033-2909
dcterms.source.titlePsychological Bulletin
curtin.note

Copyright © American Psychological Association, 2017. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/bul0000125

curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record