The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’
Access Status
Authors
Date
2018Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
This study provides an account of the pragmatic functions of the stance markers ‘I don't think’ and ‘I think + not’, based on naturally-occurring L1 (American English speakers) and L2 (Chinese and Persian English speakers) classroom corpora. Of the four pragmatic functions, emphatic, evaluative, tentative and mitigating, evaluative (informative) is used the most and mitigating (interpersonal) is used the least. The two expressions can also be explained in terms of fluidity and stretchability. There is a certainty degree of fluidity in the use of ‘I don't think’ and ‘I think + not’; they may perform more than one function simultaneously in the same utterance. Stretchability is manifested in that from the default evaluative function, the expressions stretch upwards (strengthening) to the emphatic and downwards (softening) to the tentative and mitigating functions.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Abdullah, Shamsul (2013)Teaching students to become effective thinkers is increasingly recognised as an immediate goal of education. If students are to function successfully in a highly technical society, they must be equipped with lifelong ...
-
Hegarty, M.; Mayer, S.; Kriz, S.; Keehner, Madeleine (2005)We examined the use of hand gestures while people solved spatial reasoning problems in which they had to infer how components of a mechanical device will move from a static diagram of the device (mental animation problems). ...
-
Fernández-Fontecha, A.; O halloran, K.; Tan, Sabine; Wignell, Peter (2018)© 2018, The Author(s) 2018. There is a growing interest in the use of visual thinking techniques for promoting conceptual thinking in problem solving tasks as well as for reducing the complexity of ideas expressed in ...