Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPayne, D.
dc.contributor.authorBaluchova, K.
dc.contributor.authorRussomando, G.
dc.contributor.authorAhmad-Nejad, P.
dc.contributor.authorMamotte, Cyril
dc.contributor.authorRousseau, F.
dc.contributor.authorVan Schaik, R.
dc.contributor.authorMarriott, K.
dc.contributor.authorMaekawa, M.
dc.contributor.authorChan, K.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-08T04:43:04Z
dc.date.available2018-08-08T04:43:04Z
dc.date.created2018-08-08T03:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPayne, D. and Baluchova, K. and Russomando, G. and Ahmad-Nejad, P. and Mamotte, C. and Rousseau, F. and Van Schaik, R. et al. 2018. Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: Findings of an international survey. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 57 (1): pp. 78–88.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69984
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cclm-2017-1080
dc.description.abstract

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization. Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization. The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.

dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH and Co. KG
dc.titleToward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: Findings of an international survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1434-6621
dcterms.source.titleClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
curtin.departmentSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record