Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVenable, John
dc.contributor.authorPries-Heje, J.
dc.contributor.authorBaskerville, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-08T04:43:31Z
dc.date.available2018-08-08T04:43:31Z
dc.date.created2018-08-08T03:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationVenable, J. and Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. 2017. Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology, The 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70119
dc.description.abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.

dc.titleChoosing a Design Science Research Methodology
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.conferenceThe 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems
dcterms.source.placeHobart, Tasmania
curtin.departmentSchool of Management
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record