Conceptualizing and Defining the Intention Construct for Future Physical Activity Research
| dc.contributor.author | Rhodes, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rebar, Amanda | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-13T09:08:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-12-13T09:08:40Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2018-12-12T02:46:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rhodes, R. and Rebar, A. 2017. Conceptualizing and Defining the Intention Construct for Future Physical Activity Research. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 45 (4): pp. 209-216. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71053 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1249/JES.0000000000000127 | |
| dc.description.abstract |
© 2017 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Intention has been an extremely important concept in physical activity theory and research but is complicated by a double-barreled definition of a decision to perform physical activity and the commitment to enact that decision. We put forth the hypothesis that these separate meanings have different measurement requirements, are situated in distinctly different intention-based models, and show discrete findings when explaining physical activity motives. | |
| dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | |
| dc.title | Conceptualizing and Defining the Intention Construct for Future Physical Activity Research | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 45 | |
| dcterms.source.number | 4 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 209 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 216 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 0091-6331 | |
| dcterms.source.title | Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews | |
| curtin.department | School of Psychology | |
| curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||