Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRegan, Annette
dc.contributor.authorBall, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorWarren, J.
dc.contributor.authorMalacova, Eva
dc.contributor.authorMarston, C.
dc.contributor.authorNassar, N.
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, H.
dc.contributor.authorde Klerk, N.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-13T09:09:15Z
dc.date.available2018-12-13T09:09:15Z
dc.date.created2018-12-12T02:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRegan, A. and Ball, S. and Warren, J. and Malacova, E. and Marston, C. and Nassar, N. and Leonard, H. et al. 2018. Reply to “Sibling Comparison Design in Birth-Spacing Studies”: Response to Invited Commentary. American Journal of Epidemiology. 188 (1).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71211
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aje/kwy187
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.titleReply to “Sibling Comparison Design in Birth-Spacing Studies”: Response to Invited Commentary
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1476-6256
dcterms.source.titleAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record