Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, G.
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, D.
dc.contributor.authorCaruana, N.
dc.contributor.authorBoyes, Mark
dc.contributor.authorBadcock, N.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-13T09:09:31Z
dc.date.available2018-12-13T09:09:31Z
dc.date.created2018-12-12T02:46:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMcArthur, G. and Francis, D. and Caruana, N. and Boyes, M. and Badcock, N. 2016. Self-concept in poor readers: a systematic review protocol. .
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71260
dc.identifier.doi10.7287/peerj.preprints.2062
dc.description.abstract

Individuals with poor reading ability are at greater risk of educational and occupational difficulties. In addition to this, these individuals are also at greater risk of poor health outcomes, particularly mental health. At least some of this association may be underpinned by poor self-concept; however, the evidence for this relationship is mixed. In this systematic review protocol, we outline an approach to adjudicate between three reasons for these mixed results: (1) poor reading is more closely associated with some types of self-concept than others; (2) low self-concept is more closely associated with some types of poor reading than others; and (3) low self-concept is not associated with poor reading per se, but is associated with co-morbid problems with language or attention. The protocol proposes a review (based on PRSIMA-P guidelines) to use the existing literature to explore the evidence for these possibilities to better understand the association between poor reading and low self-concept.

dc.titleSelf-concept in poor readers: a systematic review protocol
dc.typeJournal Article
curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record