Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBreed, M.
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, P.
dc.contributor.authorBischoff, A.
dc.contributor.authorDurruty, P.
dc.contributor.authorGellie, N.
dc.contributor.authorGonzales, E.
dc.contributor.authorHavens, K.
dc.contributor.authorKarmann, M.
dc.contributor.authorKilkenny, F.
dc.contributor.authorKrauss, S.
dc.contributor.authorLowe, A.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, P.
dc.contributor.authorNevill, Paul
dc.contributor.authorVitt, P.
dc.contributor.authorBucharova, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-13T09:09:56Z
dc.date.available2018-12-13T09:09:56Z
dc.date.created2018-12-12T02:46:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBreed, M. and Harrison, P. and Bischoff, A. and Durruty, P. and Gellie, N. and Gonzales, E. and Havens, K. et al. 2018. Priority actions to improve provenance decision-making. BioScience. 68 (7): pp. 510-516.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71384
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/biosci/biy050
dc.description.abstract

Selecting the geographic origin-the provenance-of seed is a key decision in restoration. The last decade has seen a vigorous debate on whether to use local or nonlocal seed. The use of local seed has been the preferred approach because it is expected to maintain local adaptation and avoid deleterious population effects (e.g., maladaptation and outbreeding depression). However, the impacts of habitat fragmentation and climate change on plant populations have driven the debate on whether the local-is-best standard needs changing. This debate has largely been theoretical in nature, which hampers provenance decision-making. Here, we detail cross-sector priority actions to improve provenance decision-making, including embedding provenance trials into restoration projects; developing dynamic, evidence-based provenance policies; and establishing stronger research-practitioner collaborations to facilitate the adoption of research outcomes. We discuss how to tackle these priority actions in order to help satisfy the restoration sector's requirement for appropriately provenanced seed.

dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.titlePriority actions to improve provenance decision-making
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume68
dcterms.source.number7
dcterms.source.startPage510
dcterms.source.endPage516
dcterms.source.issn0006-3568
dcterms.source.titleBioScience
curtin.departmentSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences (MLS)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record