Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Project governance and risk management: From first-order economizing to second-order complexity

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Tywoniak, Stephane
    Bredillet, C.
    Date
    2017
    Type
    Book Chapter
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Tywoniak, S. and Bredillet, C. 2017. Project governance and risk management: From first-order economizing to second-order complexity. In Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Project Management, 134-148. united Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    Source Title
    Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Project Management
    DOI
    10.1017/9781316662243.014
    ISBN
    9781316662243
    School
    School of Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71396
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    © Cambridge University Press 2017. Introduction Until recently, the scholarship of project management has been dominated by a traditional approach reflective of foundational views about how to conduct successful projects (Morris, 2011). This traditional approach assumes a reductionist, positivist stance (Jackson, 2003; O'Leary, 2012), which follows neoclassical economics and the rationalist model of decision-making (Goode, 1997; Simon, 1979), in which analysis and action are cleanly separated in a logical sequence (Koskela & Howell, 2002; Ryle, 1984). Many of the contributions to the emergent project governance literature (Ahola, Ruuska, Artto, & Kujala, 2014) refer back to rational economic theories that theorize the firm as a nexus of contracts (Foss, 1993). Such approaches conceive of governance as a choice of form, which then drives incentives, decision rights, and accountability. In this traditional view, risk management is conceived of as a rational, linear process of identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment (ISO, 2009) within a defined organizational context. However, the burden of calculative rationality (Levinthal & March, 1993) bestowed by the traditional approaches appears to be unbearable in practice (Guo, Chang-Richards, Wilkinson, & Li, 2014; O'Leary, 2012; Ward & Chapman, 2008; Winch & Maytorena, 2011). In this chapter, we argue that a “Third Wave” approach (Morris, Pinto, & Söderlund, 2011) to project governance and risk management is required in order to address issues of process (rather than form) and uncertainty (rather than risk). We begin with a review of how project risk management is shaped by governance. We then examine contemporary theories of risk and uncertainty and discuss their implications for governance. The chapter concludes with implications for practice. Project Governance for Risk Management: The “First-Order Economizing” Logic Two longstanding issues in the management of organizations have been to ensure that managers act in a manner satisfactory to those they are accountable to (Berle & Means, 1991), within efficiency constraints (Knight, 1921; Smith, 1776). A contemporary expression of these issues is as follows: an organization is defined as “a multiagent system with identifiable boundaries and system-level goals toward which the constituent agent's efforts are expected to make a contribution” (Puranam, Alexy, & Reitzig, 2014, p. 166).

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Post-conflict reconstruction : the complexity and challenges of planning and implementing infrastructure projects in Kosovo
      Earnest, James (2011)
      Rehabilitation and reconstruction of social and economic infrastructure in a post-conflict environment are complex and long-debated issues in development cooperation. Both in pre-conflict and post-conflict situations, ...
    • Intervention framework for quality and assurance in information systems projects
      El Desouki, Hassan Mohamed Said (2012)
      This study created an intervention framework that could be used to reduce the risk of failure in information technology projects. The study investigated social, cultural, technical and economic issues that affect information ...
    • Post-conflict Reconstruction - A Case Study in Kosovo: The Complexity of Planning and Implementing Infrastructure Projects
      Earnest, James; Dickie, Carolyn (2012)
      Background: Rehabilitation and reconstruction of social and economic infrastructure in a post-conflict environment are complex, long-debated issues in development cooperation. In addition to war creating large-scale human ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.