Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDitkof, J.
dc.contributor.authorMeckel, T.
dc.contributor.authorHovorka, S.
dc.contributor.authorCaspari, Eva
dc.contributor.authorPevzner, Roman
dc.contributor.authorUrosevic, Milovan
dc.contributor.editorSEG
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:58:11Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:58:11Z
dc.date.created2013-03-21T20:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDitkof, Julie and Meckel, Tip and Hovorka, Susan and Caspari, Eva and Pevzner, Roman and Urosevic, Milovan. 2012. Analysis of time lapse seismic signal for an EOR and CCS site, Cranfield, MS, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), Nov 4-9 2012. Las Vegas: SEG.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7173
dc.identifier.doi10.1190/segam2012-0912.1
dc.description.abstract

The Cranfield, MS EOR field site has been under CO2 flood by Denbury Onshore, LLC since 2008. More than 3 million tons of CO2 has been injected. Time-lapse 3D surface seismic data displayed a readily observable signal related to CO2 injection into the lower Tuscaloosa Formation. The intensity and the spatial distribution of time-lapse (TL) signal required further analysis. For that purpose, we carried out fluid substitution analysis, followed by volumes cross-equalization, well ties, and acoustic impedance inversions. A Gassmann workflow was used to predict the response to injected CO2 at two well locations. The 31F-2 observation well, located in a detailed area of study (DAS), was used to compare the results of time-lapse sonic data with fluid substitution results. The objective was to predict a post-injection saturation curve. A second well, well 28-1, was used to help predict an acoustic impedance change in the reservoir to use for subsequent inversion. Finally, a model based inversion was performed to quantify the impedance change between two cross-equalized time-lapse data sets. The acoustic impedance (AI) difference obtained through the inversion process is higher than that predicted for in the 28-1 injection well. The time-lapse AI signal is however in agreement with the large velocity change computed from the time delay along the marker horizon below the reservoir.

dc.publisherSEG
dc.subjectinversion
dc.subjectsequestration
dc.subject4D
dc.subjecttime-lapse
dc.subjectimpedance
dc.titleAnalysis of time lapse seismic signal for an EOR and CCS site, Cranfield, MS
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.issn1052-3812
dcterms.source.titleSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
dcterms.source.seriesSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
dcterms.source.conferenceSEG/Las Vegas 2012
dcterms.source.conference-start-dateNov 4 2012
dcterms.source.conferencelocationLas Vegas
dcterms.source.placeTulsa
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record