A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
MetadataShow full item record
Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society. BACKGROUND Concern about the use of epinephrine as a treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest led the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation to call for a placebocontrolled trial to determine whether the use of epinephrine is safe and effective in such patients. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind trial involving 8014 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom, paramedics at five National Health Service ambulance services administered either parenteral epinephrine (4015 patients) or saline placebo (3999 patients), along with standard care. The primary outcome was the rate of survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included the rate of survival until hospital discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome, as indicated by a score of 3 or less on the modified Rankin scale (which ranges from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). RESULTS At 30 days, 130 patients (3.2%) in the epinephrine group and 94 (2.4%) in the placebo group were alive (unadjusted odds ratio for survival, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.82; P = 0.02). There was no evidence of a significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived until hospital discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome (87 of 4007 patients [2.2%] vs. 74 of 3994 patients [1.9%]; unadjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.61). At the time of hospital discharge, severe neurologic impairment (a score of 4 or 5 on the modified Rankin scale) had occurred in more of the survivors in the epinephrine group than in the placebo group (39 of 126 patients [31.0%] vs. 16 of 90 patients [17.8%]). CONCLUSIONS In adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the use of epinephrine resulted in a significantly higher rate of 30-day survival than the use of placebo, but there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of a favorable neurologic outcome because more survivors had severe neurologic impairment in the epinephrine group.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trialJacobs, Ian; Finn, Judith; Jelinek, G.; Oxer, H.; Thompson, P. (2011)Background: There is little evidence from clinical trials that the use of adrenaline (epinephrine) in treating cardiac arrest improves survival, despite adrenaline being considered standard of care for many decades. The ...
Pre-hospital Assessment of the Role of Adrenaline: Measuring the Effectiveness of Drug administration In Cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC-2): Trial protocolPerkins, G.; Quinn, T.; Deakin, C.; Nolan, J.; Lall, R.; Slowther, A.; Cooke, M.; Lamb, S.; Petrou, S.; Achana, F.; Finn, Judith; Jacobs, I.; Carson, A.; Smyth, M.; Han, K.; Byers, S.; Rees, N.; Whitfield, R.; Moore, F.; Fothergill, R.; Stallard, N.; Long, J.; Hennings, S.; Horton, J.; Kaye, C.; Gates, S. (2016)Despite its use since the 1960s, the safety or effectiveness of adrenaline as a treatment for cardiac arrest has never been comprehensively evaluated in a clinical trial. Although most studies have found that adrenaline ...
Using a cardiac arrest registry to measure the quality of emergency medical service care decade of findings from the Victorian Ambulance cardiac arrest registryNehme, Z.; Bernard, S.; Cameron, P.; Bray, Janet; Meredith, I.; Lijovic, M.; Smith, K. (2015)© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc. Background: Although the value of clinical registries has been well recognized in developed countries, their use for measuring the quality of emergency medical service care remains ...