Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaravilla, J.
dc.contributor.authorBetts, K.
dc.contributor.authorCouto e Cruz, C.
dc.contributor.authorAlati, Rosa
dc.identifier.citationMaravilla, J. and Betts, K. and Couto e Cruz, C. and Alati, R. 2017. Factors influencing repeated teenage pregnancy: a review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 217 (5): pp. 527-545.e31.

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Objective: Existing evidence of predictors of repeated teenage pregnancy has not been assessed rigorously. This systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of protective and risk factors that are associated with repeated teenage pregnancy through a metaanalytical consensus. Data Sources: We used PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 1997–2015 and the reference list of other relevant research papers and related reviews. Study Eligibility Criteria: Eligibility criteria included (1) epidemiologic studies that analyzed factors associated with repeated pregnancy or birth among adolescents <20 years of age who were nulliparous or experienced at least 1 pregnancy, and (2) experimental studies with an observational component that was adjusted for the intervention. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: We performed narrative synthesis of study characteristics, participant characteristics, study results, and quality assessment. We also conducted random-effects and quality-effects metaanalyses with meta-regression to obtain pooled odds ratios of identified factors and to determine sources of between-study heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-six eligible epidemiologic studies, most from the United States (n=24), showed >47 factors with no evidence of publication bias for each metaanalysis. Use of contraception (pooled odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.35–1.02), particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives (pooled odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.45), considerably reduced repeated teenage pregnancy risk. Among studies about contraception, the number of follow-up visits (adjusted coefficient, 0.72; P=.102) and country of study (unadjusted coefficient, 2.57; permuted P=.071) explained between-study heterogeneity. Education-related factors, which included higher level of education (pooled odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.91) and school continuation (pooled odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.84), were found to be protective. Conversely, depression (pooled odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–1.87), history of abortion (pooled odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–2.54), and relationship factors, such as partner support, increased the repeated teenage pregnancy risk. Conclusion: Contraceptive use, educational factors, depression, and a history of abortion are the highly influential predictors of repeated teenage pregnancy. However, there is a lack of epidemiologic studies in low- and middle-income countries to measure the extent and characteristics of repeated teenage pregnancy across more varied settings.

dc.publisherMosby, Inc.
dc.titleFactors influencing repeated teenage pregnancy: a review and meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record