Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorBrearley, L.
dc.contributor.authorLeen, T.
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, K.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:59:33Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:59:33Z
dc.date.created2011-01-06T20:02:45Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2011-02-25
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, Teresa A. and Leslie, Gavin D. and Brearley, Linda and Leen, Timothy and O'Brien, Keith. 2010. Discharge delay, room for improvement? Australian Critical Care. 23 (3): pp. 141-149.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7389
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2010.02.003
dc.description.abstract

Aim: Patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and identified as suitable for discharge to the ward should have their discharge planned and expedited to improve patient outcomes and manage resources efficiently. We examined the hypothesis that the introduction of a critical care outreach role would decrease the frequency of discharge delay from ICU. Methods: Discharge delay was compared for two 6-month periods: (1) after introduction of the outreach role in 2008 and (2) in 2000/2001 (from an earlier study). Patients were included if discharged to a ward in the study hospital. Discharge times and reason for delay were collected by Critical Care Outreach Nurses and Critical Care Nurse Specialists. Results: Of the 516 discharges in 2008 (488 patients compared to 607 in 2000/2001), 31% of the discharges were delayed from ICU more than 8 h, an increase of 6% from 2000/2001 (p <0.001). Patients in 2008 spent more in hospital from the time of their ICU admission when their discharge was delayed (p <0.001). The most common reasons for delay in 2008 were due to no bed or delay in bed availability (53%) and medical concern (24%). This is in contrast to 2000/2001 when 80% of delays were due to no bed or delay in bed availability and 9% due to medical concern. Many factors impact on patient flow and reducing ICU discharge delays requires a collaborative, multi-factorial approach which adapts to changing organisational policy on patient flow through ICU ad the hospital, not just the discharge process in ICU.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc
dc.subjectutilisation
dc.subjectbed block
dc.subjectIntensive care
dc.subjectdischarge
dc.titleDischarge delay, room for improvement?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateSubmitted2011-01-07
dcterms.source.volume23
dcterms.source.startPage141
dcterms.source.endPage149
dcterms.source.issn1036-7314
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Critical Care
curtin.digitool.pid150647
curtin.note

The link to the journal’s home page is: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/710660/description#description. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

curtin.pubStatusPublished
curtin.departmentSchool of Nursing and Midwifery
curtin.identifier.scriptidPUB-HEA-SON-EC-58446
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record