Monitoring Moral Virtue: When the Moral Transgressions of In-Group Members Are Judged More Severely
MetadataShow full item record
© The Author(s) 2018. Literature indicates that people tend to judge the moral transgressions committed by out-group members more severely than those of in-group members. However, these transgressions often conflate a moral transgression with some form of intergroup harm. There is little research examining in-group versus out-group transgressions of harmless offenses, which violate moral standards that bind people together (binding foundations). As these moral standards center around group cohesiveness, a transgression committed by an in-group member may be judged more severely. The current research presented Dutch Muslims (Study 1), American Christians (Study 2), and Indian Hindus (Study 3) with a set of fictitious stories depicting harmless and harmful moral transgressions. Consistent with our expectations, participants who strongly identified with their religious community judged harmless moral offenses committed by in-group members, relative to out-group members, more severely. In contrast, this effect was absent when participants judged harmful moral transgressions. We discuss the implications of these results.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Moral choice in an agency framework and related motivational typologies as impacted by personal and contextual factors for financial institutions in China.Woodbine, Gordon F. (2002)In this study an empirical investigation is conducted of the factors affecting moral choice, a necessary antecedent to moral behaviour (or action). The theoretical framework has drawn upon Rest's (1983, 1986) model of ...
Developing, implementing and evaluating the use of ethical frameworks in teaching bioethics issues in a Year 10 biotechnology programYap, Siew Fong (2012)With the re-emergence of values education in the school curriculum in the last decade, science is viewed as one of the key teaching domains, and in particular, socio-scientific education is increasingly perceived as ...
Societies’ tightness moderates age differences in perceived justifiability of morally debatable behaviorsJiang, D.; Li, T.; Hamamura, Takeshi (2015)Research on age differences in moral judgment tends to focus on children and adolescents. The current study examined age differences in perceived justifiability of morally debatable behaviors across adulthood cross-culturally. ...