Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhu, M.
dc.contributor.authorHuq, M.
dc.contributor.authorBillah, B.
dc.contributor.authorTran, L.
dc.contributor.authorReid, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorVaratharajah, K.
dc.contributor.authorRosenfeldt, F.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T04:18:02Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T04:18:02Z
dc.date.created2019-02-19T03:58:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2019-02-19
dc.identifier.citationZhu, M. and Huq, M. and Billah, B. and Tran, L. and Reid, C. and Varatharajah, K. and Rosenfeldt, F. 2018. On-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database. Heart, Lung and Circulation.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74782
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.1051
dc.description.abstract

© 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries a high risk of mortality. By avoiding cardioplegic arrest and aortic cross-clamping, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBEAT) may benefit patients requiring urgent or emergency revascularisation in the setting of AMI. We evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of ONBEAT versus conventional CABG (ONSTOP) utilising the ANZSCTS National Cardiac Surgery Database. Methods: Between 2001 and 2015, 5851 patients underwent non-elective on-pump CABG within 7 days of AMI. Of these, 77 patients (1.3%) underwent ONBEAT and 5774 (98.7%) underwent ONSTOP surgery. Propensity-score matching (with a 1:2 matching ratio) was performed for risk adjustment. Survival data were obtained from the National Death Index. Results: Before matching, the unadjusted 30-day mortality was ONBEAT: 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP: 256/5774 (4.4%), p < 0.001. Preoperative factors independently associated with the ONBEAT were: septuagenarian age, peripheral vascular disease, redo surgery, cardiogenic shock, emergency surgery and single-vessel disease. After propensity-score matching, 30-day mortality was similar (ONBEAT: 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP: 16/154 (10.4%), p = 0.85), as was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ONBEAT: 17/77 (22.1%) vs. ONSTOP: 38/154 (24.7%), p = 0.84). ONBEAT patients received fewer distal anastomoses and were more likely to have incomplete revascularisation (ONBEAT: 15/77 (19.5%) vs. ONSTOP: 15/154, (9.7%), p = 0.03). Despite this, 12-year survival was comparable (ONBEAT: 64.8% (95% CI 39.4-82.4%) vs. ONSTOP: 63.6% (95% CI 50.5, 74.3%), p = 0.89). Conclusions: ONBEAT can be performed safely in high-risk patients requiring CABG early after AMI with similar short and long-term survival compared to ONSTOP.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleOn-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateSubmitted2019-02-19
dcterms.source.issn1443-9506
dcterms.source.titleHeart, Lung and Circulation
curtin.digitool.pid274938
curtin.pubStatusIn Press
curtin.refereedTRUE
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.identifier.scriptidPUB-VC-ORD-SA-114336
curtin.identifier.elementsidELEMENTS-241293
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record