View Item 

What does overclaiming represent? Well, it depends!

Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Dunlop, Patrick
Bourdage, Joshua S
de Vries, Reinout E
McNeill, Ilona M
Jorritsma, Karina
Orchard, Megan
Austen, Tomas
Baines, Teesha
Choe, Weng-Khong
Date
2019
Type
Conference Paper

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Dunlop, P. and Bourdage, J.S. and de Vries, R.E. and McNeill, I.M. and Jorritsma, K. and Orchard, M. and Austen, T. et al. 2019. What does overclaiming represent? Well, it depends!, in The International Society for the Study of Individual Differences conference, Jul 29-Aug 2 2019. Florence, Italy: ISID.
Source Conference
International Society for the Study of Individual Differences
Additional URLs
Faculty
Faculty of Business and Law
School
Future of Work Institute
URI
Collection
Abstract

Overclaiming behaviour, as measured by overclaiming questionnaires (OCQs), has been proposed as a potential indicator of unconscious self-enhancement, conscious/deliberate impression management, careless responding, and even genuine subject matter knowledge. However, the evidence for each of these propositions is very mixed. In this research, we draw from the principles of classical expectancy (VIE) theory to show that overclaiming behaviour likely represents different phenomena as a function of the conditions under which it is observed. Specifically, using a ‘personnel selection’ paradigm, we show through multiple studies that overclaiming performs well as an indicator of deliberate faking, provided three conditions are met: (a) faking is associated with a desired goal (valence is high), (b) the OCQ’s content is tailored appropriately to the assessment situation, such that overclaiming becomes instrumental to achieving that desired goal, and (c) respondents’ expectancies regarding their capacity to overclaim successfully are not undermined.