Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKnight, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, M.
dc.contributor.authorDawson, J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T06:40:44Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T06:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKnight, C. and Patterson, M. and Dawson, J. 2019. Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 28 (3): pp. 348-372.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/76394
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887
dc.description.abstract

© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Work engagement is associated with important individual and organisational outcomes (e.g. employee health and well-being, performance). This narrative systematic review aims to synthesise the increasing number of work engagement interventions and inform future research by exploring: (1) the specific intervention foci, delivery methods and content of engagement interventions; (2) intervention effectiveness; and (3) underlying mediators and moderators. A systematic search for interventions employing a validated engagement measure revealed 40 studies. Five were personal resource building, twelve job resource building, three leadership training, eighteen health promotion, and two job and personal resource building. Twenty (50%) studies observed significant positive effects on work engagement, two (5%) had a negative effect, and eighteen (45%) had no effect. Job and personal resources, job demands and well-being were important mediators. Moderators included the specific intervention focus and delivery method, employee participation, manager support, and intervention level (top-down vs bottom-up). Bottom-up interventions, and job crafting and mindfulness interventions particularly, were most successful. Implementation difficulties were common, including poor response and attrition rates, and adverse factors (e.g. organisational restructuring, redundancy, economic downturn). We highlight implications for research and practice and stress the need to test underlying theories to build knowledge around how, why, and when interventions work.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectPsychology, Applied
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectBusiness & Economics
dc.subjectWork engagement interventions
dc.subjectjob demands-resources
dc.subjectwellbeing
dc.subjectintervention implementation
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectJOB DEMANDS
dc.subjectOCCUPATIONAL STRESS
dc.subjectPOSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTION
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectMINDFULNESS
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectRESOURCES
dc.subjectOUTCOMES
dc.subjectMETAANALYSIS
dc.titleWork engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume28
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage348
dcterms.source.endPage372
dcterms.source.issn1359-432X
dcterms.source.titleEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
dc.date.updated2019-10-04T06:40:44Z
curtin.note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 06/04/2019 available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887

curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law
curtin.contributor.orcidKnight, Caroline [0000-0001-9894-7750]
dcterms.source.eissn1464-0643
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridKnight, Caroline [57204781616]


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record