A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
MetadataShow full item record
Introduction: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. Results: There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9-84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7-85.5) was not significantly different (P = 1.00). Conclusion: Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients. © 2005 Ho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: A comparison of 3 prognostic scoresHo, K.; Williams, Teresa; Harahsheh, Y.; Higgins, T. (2016)Purpose: This study compared the performance of 3 admission prognostic scores in predicting hospital mortality. Materials and methods: Patient admission characteristics and hospital outcome of 9549 patients were recorded ...
An investigation of the physiological and biochemical responses elicited by Panulirus cygnus to harvesting, holding and live transport.Spanoghe, Patrick T. (1996)The western rock lobster (WRL), Panulirus cygnus is a decapod crustacean which is found in abundance in the coastal waters of Western Australia and which supports a major fishery of economic importance for the State, with ...
Repeatability of the Six-Minute Walk Test and Relation to Physical Function in Survivors of a Critical IllnessAlison, J.; Kenny, P.; King, M.; McKinley, S.; Aitken, L.; Leslie, Gavin; Elliott, D. (2012)Background: The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is widely used as an outcome measure in exercise rehabilitation. However, the repeatability of the 6MWT performed at home in survivors of a critical illness has not been evaluated. ...