Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDi Pietro, Flavia
dc.contributor.authorCatley, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorMcAuley, J.H.
dc.contributor.authorParkitny, L.
dc.contributor.authorMaher, C.G.
dc.contributor.authorDa Costa, L.C.M.
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, L.G.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorMoseley, G.L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T03:45:57Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T03:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationDi Pietro, F. and Catley, M.J. and McAuley, J.H. and Parkitny, L. and Maher, C.G. and Da Costa, L.C.M. and Macedo, L.G. et al. 2014. Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical Therapy. 94 (1): pp. 91-100.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79569
dc.identifier.doi10.2522/ptj.20130217
dc.description.abstract

Background. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is used by physical therapists in clinical practice and in research. However, current understanding of the PSEQ's measurement properties is incomplete, and investigators cannot be confident that it provides unbiased information on patient self-efficacy. Objective. The aims of this study were: (1) to investigate the scale properties of the PSEQ using Rasch analysis and (2) to determine whether age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and pain-related disability bias function of the PSEQ. Design. This was a retrospective study; data were obtained from 3 existing studies. Methods. Data were combined from more than 600 patients with low back pain of varying duration. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate targeting, category ordering, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, and item bias. Results. There was evidence of adequate category ordering, unidimensionality, and internal consistency of the PSEQ. Importantly, there was no evidence of item bias. Limitations. The PSEQ did not adequately target the sample; instead, it targeted people with lower self-efficacy than this population. Item 7 was hardest for participants to endorse, showing excessive positive misfit to the Rasch model. Response strings of misfitting persons revealed older participants and those reporting high levels of disability. Conclusions. The individual items of the PSEQ can be validly summed to provide a score of self-efficacy that is robust to age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and disability. Although item 7 is the most problematic, it may provide important clinical information and requires further investigation before its exclusion. Although the PSEQ is commonly used with people with low back pain, of whom the sample in this study was representative, the results suggest it targets patients with lower self-efficacy than that observed in the current sample. © 2014 American Physical Therapy Association.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectLOW-BACK-PAIN
dc.subjectDISABILITY
dc.subjectVALIDATION
dc.subjectBELIEFS
dc.subjectSCALES
dc.subjectMODEL
dc.titleRasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume94
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage91
dcterms.source.endPage100
dcterms.source.issn0031-9023
dcterms.source.titlePhysical Therapy
dc.date.updated2020-06-09T03:45:57Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidDi Pietro, Flavia [0000-0002-9642-0805]
curtin.contributor.researcheridDi Pietro, Flavia [P-5415-2018]
dcterms.source.eissn1538-6724
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridDi Pietro, Flavia [6603432291]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record