Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLockery, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorRigby, J.
dc.contributor.authorCollyer, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorWoods, R.L.
dc.contributor.authorMcNeil, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorReid, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorErnst, M.E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T03:56:55Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T03:56:55Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLockery, J.E. and Rigby, J. and Collyer, T.A. and Stewart, A.C. and Woods, R.L. and McNeil, J.J. and Reid, C.M. et al. 2019. Optimising medication data collection in a large-scale clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 14 (12): Article No. e0226868.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80054
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0226868
dc.description.abstract

© 2019 Lockery et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Objective: Pharmaceuticals play an important role in clinical care. However, in community-based research, medication data are commonly collected as unstructured free-text, which is prohibitively expensive to code for large-scale studies. The ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study developed a two-pronged framework to collect structured medication data for 19,114 individuals. ASPREE provides an opportunity to determine whether medication data can be cost-effectively collected and coded, en masse from the community using this framework. Methods: The ASPREE framework of type-to-search box with automated coding and linked free text entry was compared to traditional method of free-text only collection and post hoc coding. Reported medications were classified according to their method of collection and analysed by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) group. Relative cost of collecting medications was determined by calculating the time required for database set up and medication coding. Results Overall, 122,910 participant structured medication reports were entered using the type-tosearch box and 5,983 were entered as free-text. Free-text data contributed 211 unique medications not present in the type-to-search box. Spelling errors and unnecessary provision of additional information were among the top reasons why medications were reported as freetext. The cost per medication using the ASPREE method was approximately USD $0.03 compared with USD $0.20 per medication for the traditional method. Conclusion Implementation of this two-pronged framework is a cost-effective alternative to free-text only data collection in community-based research. Higher initial set-up costs of this combined method are justified by long term cost effectiveness and the scientific potential for analysis and discovery gained through collection of detailed, structured medication data.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary Sciences
dc.subjectScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subjectREDUCING EVENTS
dc.subjectPOLYPHARMACY
dc.subjectTRANSITION
dc.subjectASPIRIN
dc.subjectASPREE
dc.titleOptimising medication data collection in a large-scale clinical trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume14
dcterms.source.number12
dcterms.source.issn1932-6203
dcterms.source.titlePLoS ONE
dc.date.updated2020-07-16T03:56:51Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidReid, Christopher [0000-0001-9173-3944]
curtin.identifier.article-numberARTN e0226868
dcterms.source.eissn1932-6203


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/