Legacy effect of delayed blood pressure lowering drug treatment in middle-aged adults with mildly elevated blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis
Access Status
Authors
Date
2020Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Remarks
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Human Hypertension. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-0323-7.
Collection
Abstract
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
To investigate if there is evidence for a ‘legacy effect’ for blood pressure (BP) lowering treatment, that is, worse health outcomes from not initiating drug treatment at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg in middle-age adults. We systematically reviewed studies comparing the effects of delayed BP treatment (placebo/untreated during the trial or no previous treatment at trial entry) vs. early treatment (actively treated during the trial or previous BP treatment at trial entry) on mortality in the short term (5-year in-trial period) and long term (≥10 years in total period). The data were pooled using Peto ORs. A subgroup analysis by 10-year Framingham risk score was performed. Three studies (ALLHAT, Oslo and PREVEND-IT) involving 4746 participants were included. The results were heavily influenced by the ALLHAT trial. We found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between ‘delayed BP’ and ‘early treatment’ in the short-term OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.68–1.32) or long-term OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.78–1.04), with similar results for mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). The effects of delayed BP lowering treatment on long-term all-cause and CVD mortality did not vary with baseline risk of CVD. The review showed no clinically adverse ‘legacy effect’ on mortality or major CVD event from not treating middle-aged adults at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg or over. The results were consistent for all CVD risk subgroups. Although these studies are non-randomised post-hoc analyses, they may allay concerns that early treatment of elevated systolic BP is necessary to prevent CVD events in primary prevention populations.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ho, C.; Sanders, S.; Doust, J.; Breslin, M.; Reid, Christopher; Nelson, M. (2017)Background: Many national and international guidelines recommend that the initiation of blood pressure (BP)-lowering drug treatment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) should no longer be based on ...
-
Nelson, M.; Chowdhury, E.; Doust, J.; Reid, Christopher; Wing, L. (2015)© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Objectives: Current blood pressure (BP) management guidelines recommend that treatment thresholds for BP be based on absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk rather ...
-
Chow, C.; Thakkar, J.; Bennett, A.; Hillis, G.; Burke, M.; Usherwood, T.; Vo, K.; Rogers, K.; Atkins, E.; Webster, R.; Chou, M.; Dehbi, H.; Salam, A.; Patel, A.; Neal, B.; Peiris, D.; Krum, H.; Chalmers, J.; Nelson, M.; Reid, Christopher; Woodward, M.; Hilmer, S.; Thom, S.; Rodgers, A. (2017)© 2017 Elsevier Ltd Background Globally, most patients with hypertension are treated with monotherapy, and control rates are poor because monotherapy only reduces blood pressure by around 9/5 mm Hg on average. There is ...