Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChong, Heap Yih
dc.contributor.authorAdnan, H.
dc.contributor.authorZin, R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:04:02Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:04:02Z
dc.date.created2015-07-16T06:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationChong, H.Y. and Adnan, H. and Zin, R. 2012. A Feasible Means of Methodological Advance From Delphi Methods: A Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research. 4: pp. 247-253.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8024
dc.description.abstract

The Delphi is reliable research tool of eliciting experts’ opinion. Traditional Delphi method (TDM) consists of a series of rounds interspersed with feedback for the consensus. However, Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) requires only one round of investigation to denote the consensus using the geometric mean in the fuzzy triangular approach. The obvious difference needs to be addressed as it could threaten the original values of the Delphi method. Therefore, the aim of this article is to overcome the drawbacks of the TDM and the FDM. Both techniques’ principles and methodological areas were examined. A methodological proposal or framework was developed based on the mutual and positive characteristics of the methods. Subsequently, a case study was carried out and observations were gathered. The lessons learned from the theory and the application would render an insight for another methodological approach in Delphi methods.

dc.publisherProgress IPS LLC
dc.subjectFuzzy Delphi method
dc.subjectmethodology framework
dc.subjectTraditional Delphi method
dc.subjectcase study
dc.titleA Feasible Means of Methodological Advance From Delphi Methods: A Case Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume4
dcterms.source.startPage247
dcterms.source.endPage253
dcterms.source.issn2075-4124
dcterms.source.titleInternational Journal of Academic Research
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record