Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelmholz, Petra
dc.contributor.authorBelton, David
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Nick
dc.contributor.authorHollick, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Andrew
dc.contributor.editorRodrigues, Jennifer A
dc.contributor.editorTraviglia, Arianna
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T04:13:06Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T04:13:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHelmholz, P. and Belton, D. and Oliver, N. and Hollick, J. and Woods, A. 2020. The Influence of the Point Cloud Comparison Methods on the Verification of Point Clouds Using the Batavia Reconstruction as a Case Study. IKUWA6 Shared Heritage: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress for Underwater Archaeology. 6: pp. 370-381.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/81628
dc.description.abstract

The wreck of the VOC ship Batavia (1629) was discovered in 1963 on Morning Reef, in the Wallabi Group of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands. The site was excavated over four seasons in the 1970s. During these seasons, over 3500 underwater photographs were taken of the site by Green and Baker (Green 1989). The project team scanned all of the original 35mm photographs of the Batavia wreck site and applied photogrammetric 3D reconstruction techniques to generate a large selection of detailed 3D models of the in situ ship’s timbers (prior to and during excavation) and the surrounding site. These 3D models provide a realistic depiction of the 3D shape and layout of the site, which can be visualised in full-scale in a virtual environment display such as at the Curtin HIVE (Woods et al. 2020) or a head-mounted display (HMD). Some of the historical photosets had been captured for the purpose of generating a relatively successful 2D hard-copy photomosaic of the area, the only option available at the time. However, photogrammetric 3D reconstruction techniques have allowed a much more detailed and realistic 3D rendering of the area to be generated. A 2D photomosaic assumes a flat site and, therefore, imposes significant distortions on the mosaic, whereas 3D reconstruction produces 3D models, which can allow accurate site measurements to be obtained. This paper discusses the 3D reconstruction processes used, details of a new ‘expanded’ 3D reconstruction technique, and discusses the results concerning the processing of this significant legacy dataset.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherArchaeopress Archaeology
dc.relation.urihttp://archaeopress.com/ArchaeopressShop/Public/displayProductDetail.asp?id=%7B153A2BF3-349E-4939-B96A-BA8FC5D2A5F6%7D
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleThe Influence of the Point Cloud Comparison Methods on the Verification of Point Clouds Using the Batavia Reconstruction as a Case Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume6
dcterms.source.startPage370
dcterms.source.endPage381
dcterms.source.titleIKUWA6 Shared Heritage: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress for Underwater Archaeology
dcterms.source.isbn978-1-78491-642-8
dcterms.source.placeOxford, UK
dc.date.updated2020-11-04T04:13:04Z
curtin.departmentHumanities Research and Graduate Studies
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Humanities
curtin.contributor.orcidWoods, Andrew [0000-0002-8677-2460]
curtin.contributor.orcidHelmholz, Petra [0000-0001-9894-3119]
curtin.contributor.orcidBelton, David [0000-0002-2879-7918]
curtin.contributor.researcheridWoods, Andrew [H-8547-2015]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridWoods, Andrew [7201563321]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/