Specification and testing of hierarchical ordered response models with anchoring vignettes
MetadataShow full item record
Collection and analysis of self‐reported information on an ordered Likert scale is ubiquitous across the social sciences. Inference from such analyses is valid where the response scale employed means the same thing to all individuals. That is, if there is no differential item functioning (DIF) present in the data. A priori this is unlikely to hold across all individuals and cohorts in any sample of data. For this reason, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a way to correct for DIF when individuals self‐assess their health (or well‐being, or satisfaction levels, or disability levels, etc.) on an ordered categorical scale. Using an example of self‐assessed pain, we illustrate the use of vignettes to adjust for DIF using the compound hierarchical ordered probit model (CHOPIT). The validity of this approach relies on the two underlying assumptions of response consistency (RC) and vignette equivalence (VE). Using a minor amendment to the specification of the standard CHOPIT model, we develop easy‐to‐implement score tests of the null hypothesis of RC and VE both separately and jointly. Monte Carlo simulations show that the tests have good size and power properties in finite samples. We illustrate the use of the tests by applying them to our empirical example. The tests should aid more robust analyses of self‐reported survey outcomes collected alongside anchoring vignettes.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Jiwa, Moyez; Gordon, M.; Arnet, Hayley; Ee, H.; Bulsara, Max; Colwell, B. (2008)BACKGROUND: In Australia and in the United Kingdom (UK) access to specialists is sanctioned by General Practitioners (GPs). It is important to understand how practitioners determine which patients warrant referral. METHODS: ...
Referring advanced cancer patients for palliative treatment: A national structured vignette survey of Australian GPsHalkett, Georgia; Jiwa, Moyez; Meng, Xingqiong (Rosie); Leong, E. (2013)Background: Although (general practitioners) GPs have a role in managing patients with advanced cancer, little is known about their referral decisions. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore, using structured vignettes, ...
Supporting Patients Treated for Prostate Cancer: A Video Vignette Study With an Email-Based Educational Program in General PracticeJiwa, Moyez; Halkett, Georgia; Meng, Xingqiong; Pillai, Vinita; Berg, Melissa; Shaw, T. (2014)Background: Men who have been treated for prostate cancer in Australia can consult their general practitioner (GP) for advice about symptoms or side effects at any time following treatment. However, there is no evidence ...