Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoward, Joshua L
dc.contributor.authorChong, Jane
dc.contributor.authorBureau, Julien S
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T06:58:57Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T06:58:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHoward, J.L. and Chong, J.X.Y. and Bureau, J.S. 2020. The tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30-year retrospective and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality. 88 (6): pp. 1268-1285.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/82635
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopy.12570
dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intrinsic motivation is a well-established concept in psychology, yet, different types of intrinsic motivation have not been thoroughly investigated. We examined covariates associated with three types of intrinsic motivation from self-determination theory (SDT) within the education context: IM to know, IM to accomplish, and IM to experience stimulation.

METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted on samples examining the tripartite model of intrinsic motivation between 1989 and 2019. In total, 78 samples met the inclusion criteria, representing 41,633 participants across multiple nationalities. The average age of participants across samples was 19 years, and 58.2% of participants were female. Path analysis and relative weight analysis were applied to meta-analytically derived correlations.

DISCUSSION: Results indicated that IM to know and IM to accomplish were moderately strong predictors of adaptive student outcomes. However, results also indicated a large degree of redundancy including indistinguishable antecedent pathways. IM to experience stimulation was positively, yet, less strongly associated with adaptive outcomes. However, it did appear to be empirically distinct from the remaining intrinsic motivation types in respect to its outcomes and antecedents.

CONCLUSION: Intrinsic motivation appears to be a relatively homogeneous construct within educational psychology. Specification of different types of intrinsic motivation is likely to provide only marginal benefit.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectPsychology, Social
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectintrinsic motivation
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectself-determination theory
dc.subjecttripartite model
dc.subjectSELF-DETERMINED MOTIVATION
dc.subjectACADEMIC MOTIVATION
dc.subjectPHYSICAL-EDUCATION
dc.subjectEXTRINSIC MOTIVATION
dc.subjectAUTONOMY SUPPORT
dc.subjectPUBLICATION BIAS
dc.subjectSCALE
dc.subjectSTUDENTS
dc.subjectVALIDATION
dc.subjectACHIEVEMENT
dc.titleThe tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30-year retrospective and meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume88
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage1268
dcterms.source.endPage1285
dcterms.source.issn0022-3506
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Personality
dc.date.updated2021-02-18T06:58:57Z
curtin.note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Howard, JL, Chong, JXY, Bureau, JS. The tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30-year retrospective and meta-analysis. J Pers. 2020; 88: 1268– 1285 which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12570 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law
curtin.contributor.orcidChong, Jane [0000-0002-3840-0566]
dcterms.source.eissn1467-6494


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record