Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films?
| dc.contributor.author | Veder, Jean-Pierre | |
| dc.contributor.author | Patel, Kunal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Junqiao | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alam, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | James, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nelson, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | De Marco, Roland | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T11:08:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T11:08:15Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2013-04-03T20:00:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Veder, Jean-Pierre and Patel, Kunal and Lee, Junqiao and Alam, Muhammad Tanzirul and James, Michael and Nelson, Andrew and De Marco, Roland. 2013. Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films? Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 15 (5): pp. 1364-1368. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8701 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1039/c2cp43333h | |
| dc.description.abstract |
Resistivities of thin polymer films increase abruptly with decreasing thickness, although the corresponding decline in resistance plateaus below a certain thickness. One can jump to the incorrect conclusion that quantum confinement and surface scattering are responsible for this behaviour, and we highlight the pitfalls of committing such an error. | |
| dc.publisher | R S C Publications | |
| dc.title | Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films? | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 15 | |
| dcterms.source.number | 5 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 1364 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 1368 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 1463-9076 | |
| dcterms.source.title | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | |
| curtin.department | ||
| curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |