Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCornelis, Jari
dc.contributor.authorParkin, T.
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Bill
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T02:02:48Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T02:02:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCornelis, J. and Parkin, T. and Bateman, P.W. 2021. Killing them softly: A review on snake translocation and an Australian case study. Herpetological Journal. 31 (3): pp. 118-131.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/87410
dc.identifier.doi10.33256/31.3.118131
dc.description.abstract

Human-wildlife conflicts with ‘nuisance’ snakes are becoming more frequent around the world as urbanisation continues to encroach on remaining habitats. In an attempt to mitigate this issue, snakes are often translocated in an uncontrolled fashion, with little to no conservation value. To determine the most appropriate methods of translocation we reviewed the available primary literature on studies performing translocations of snakes. We found two types of translocation: long and short-distance. Based on the welfare of the animals involved and difficulty of achieving success with long-distance translocations, we deduced that short-distance translocations are the most favourable. We also reviewed the literature on a third method-repatriating wild populations of snakes with captive-bred or captive-reared individuals, the results of which were very similar to those of long-distance translocations. In conjunction with a mark recapture study carried out by snake catchers in Darwin, Australia, we use our findings to make suggestions on the most appropriate course of action for the mitigation-based snake catching activities in Australia. The difficulty of ensuring successful outcomes for long distance translocations along with a high mortality rate meant we cannot suggest this as an appropriate method for managing ‘nuisance’ snakes. Instead, we argue that short distance translocations are the most suitable for the welfare of the snakes involved. Nevertheless, no outcome will be more favourable for the snakes than to be simply released within their home range accompanied by a change in attitude of the general public towards a willingness to coexist. Although we focus primarily on Australia our suggested framework can be applied in any country where there is conflict with snakes. Furthermore, should our suggestions be implemented, they are merely a temporary solution to an ongoing problem and we are in desperate need for further research to devise a long-term management plan.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBRITISH HERPETOL SOC
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectZoology
dc.subjectserpentes
dc.subjecttranslocation
dc.subjectrelocation
dc.subjectrepatriation
dc.subjecthuman-wildlife conflict
dc.subjectSHORT-DISTANCE TRANSLOCATION
dc.subjectSPATIAL ECOLOGY
dc.subjectHABITAT USE
dc.subjectMORELIA-SPILOTA
dc.subjectNOTECHIS-SCUTATUS
dc.subjectACTIVITY PATTERNS
dc.subjectREINTRODUCTION
dc.subjectREPTILES
dc.subjectAMPHIBIANS
dc.subjectRESIDENT
dc.titleKilling them softly: A review on snake translocation and an Australian case study
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume31
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage118
dcterms.source.endPage131
dcterms.source.issn0268-0130
dcterms.source.titleHerpetological Journal
dc.date.updated2022-01-24T02:02:47Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences (MLS)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.contributor.orcidBateman, Bill [0000-0002-3036-5479]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridBateman, Bill [7006469998]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record