Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManero, A.
dc.contributor.authorKragt, M.
dc.contributor.authorStandish, R.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, B.
dc.contributor.authorJasper, D.
dc.contributor.authorBoggs, G.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Renee
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T01:26:38Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T01:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationManero, A. and Kragt, M. and Standish, R. and Miller, B. and Jasper, D. and Boggs, G. and Young, R. 2020. A framework for developing completion criteria for mine closure and rehabilitation. Journal of Environmental Management. 273: Article No. 111078.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/87892
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111078
dc.description.abstract

The mining industry is a major contributor to Australia's economy. However, such returns may come at high environmental and social costs, including loss of biodiversity or heritage values. Thus, companies worldwide are required to rehabilitate mine sites to a state that is safe, non-polluting and capable of supporting an agreed post-mining land use. While national and international guidelines on mine rehabilitation and closure exist, there is a lack of guidance on how to define achievable and measurable criteria that reflect rehabilitation success. This often leads to discrepancies between proponents and regulators, which hinder progression towards mine closure and relinquishment. The purpose of this study was to develop a systematic framework for the definition of completion criteria for mine closure and rehabilitation. The study was informed by a global review of the literature and collaborative research with mining stakeholders from Western Australia. The proposed framework consists of six fundamental steps: 1) selection of post mining land use; 2) definition of aspects and closure objectives; 3) selection of reference(s); 4) selection of attributes; 5) definition of completion criteria; and 6) evaluation of performance. This framework is the first to provide a step-by-step guide for defining site-specific completion criteria and applying a risk-based monitoring approach throughout the life of mine. The framework is applicable across jurisdictions and industries, in Australia and internationally, that require similar rehabilitation of disturbed lands.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/IC150100041
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subjectClosure criteria
dc.subjectLand rehabilitation
dc.subjectMine relinquishment
dc.subjectEcological restoration
dc.subjectMine reclamation
dc.subjectWestern Australia
dc.subjectNATURAL SHRUBLAND COMMUNITIES
dc.subjectJARRAH FOREST RESTORATION
dc.subjectSOIL QUALITY INDICATORS
dc.subjectBAUXITE
dc.subjectRECLAMATION
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE
dc.subjectEXAMPLE
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectGROWTH
dc.subjectMODEL
dc.titleA framework for developing completion criteria for mine closure and rehabilitation
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume273
dcterms.source.issn0301-4797
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Environmental Management
dc.date.updated2022-02-22T01:26:37Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences (MLS)
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.contributor.orcidYoung, Renee [0000-0003-0806-0828]
curtin.identifier.article-numberARTN 111078
dcterms.source.eissn1095-8630


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/