“Everyone has a voice”: Developing an Evidence-Based Framework for Consensus Moderation in Higher Education
Access Status
Open access
Date
2022Supervisor
Lynne Roberts
Type
Thesis
Award
PhD
Metadata
Show full item recordFaculty
Health Sciences
School
School of Psychology
Collection
Abstract
Assessment requires academics to make judgements about student work. As there is variability in mark allocation, moderation is required to ensure fairness and consistency in assessment practices. Consensus moderation is one model of moderation, where collaboration and discussion take place between markers to reach an agreement on mark allocation. Through a sequential exploratory qualitative four-phase multiple methods design, this body of research developed an evidence-based framework for consensus moderation in higher education.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Vitorasso, R.; Camillo, C.; Cavalheri, Vinicius; Aparecida Hernandes, N.; Cortez Verceze, A.; Cortez Verceze, T.; Ferreira Monteiro, F.; Ramos, E.; Pitta, F. (2012)BACKGROUND: So far there are no studies investigating whether the time spent walking in daily life by patients with COPD corresponds to an activity of at least moderate intensity according to the recommendations of the ...
-
Sharma, Piyush; Mathur, R.; Dhawan, A. (2009)Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the moderating influence of attitude toward offshore call centers (OCCs) and brand image of the service provider firm on the relationships among perceived service quality ...
-
Lawson, Kathryn; Yorke, Jon (2009)Assessment practices generally are notoriously resistant to change, and the complexities of innovating in higher education are well documented in the literature. Moderation is associated with fair assessment, but associated ...