Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMason, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.supervisorLynne Robertsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-31T08:05:48Z
dc.date.available2022-05-31T08:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88662
dc.description.abstract

Assessment requires academics to make judgements about student work. As there is variability in mark allocation, moderation is required to ensure fairness and consistency in assessment practices. Consensus moderation is one model of moderation, where collaboration and discussion take place between markers to reach an agreement on mark allocation. Through a sequential exploratory qualitative four-phase multiple methods design, this body of research developed an evidence-based framework for consensus moderation in higher education.

en_US
dc.publisherCurtin Universityen_US
dc.title“Everyone has a voice”: Developing an Evidence-Based Framework for Consensus Moderation in Higher Educationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dcterms.educationLevelPhDen_US
curtin.departmentSchool of Psychologyen_US
curtin.accessStatusOpen accessen_US
curtin.facultyHealth Sciencesen_US
curtin.contributor.orcidMason, Jacqueline [0000-0003-1151-3701]en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record