The validity of Henry VIII clauses in Australian federal legislation
Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Moens, Gabriel
Trone, J.
Date
2012Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Moens, Gabriel and Trone, John. 2012. The validity of Henry VIII clauses in Australian federal legislation. Journal of Constitutional History / Giornale di Storia Constituzionale. 24: pp. 133-143.
Source Title
Journal of Constitutional History Giornale di Storia Constituzionale
ISSN
Collection
Abstract
The Australian High Court has stated that the federal Parliament may not abdicate its legislative powers. However, the Court’s concept of abdication only prohibits an abdication or renunciation of the power of Parliament to repeal or amend a statute. This concept of abdication is so narrow that it has not proved to be a meaningful limitation in practice. This paper argues that the Court should modify its abdication doctrine so that a delegation of power to amend statute law by regulation would constitute an abdication of legislative power. Subordinate legislation must at least be subordinate to primary legislation.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Craven, Greg (2006)This paper explores the Commonwealth's power over universities. First it considers the extent of Commonwealth constitutional power as a matter of strict law and second it considers that constitutional power within a wider ...
-
Callaghan, R.; Sanches, M.; Gatley, J.; Stockwell, Tim (2014)Background: Given the recent international debates about the effectiveness and appropriate age setpoints for legislated minimum legal drinking ages (MLDAs), the current study estimates the impact of Canadian MLDAs on ...
-
Hodgson, Helen (2014)Since 1978 it has been unusual for the Federal Government to have a majority in both houses of Parliament. Where the government does not have a majority in the Senate it must negotiate with the Opposition and minor parties ...