Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Dan
dc.contributor.authorSheng, Zitong
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xueqing
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Mark
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yiting
dc.contributor.authorWang, Ziying
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T01:00:12Z
dc.date.available2022-08-29T01:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationWang, D. and Sheng, Z. and Wang, X. and Griffin, M.A. and Zhang, Y. and Wang, Z. 2021. How team safety stressors affect proactive and prosocial safety behaviors: Felt safety responsibility and affective commitment as mediators. Safety Science . 147: 105625.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/89262
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105625
dc.description.abstract

Although research has thoroughly established that employees’ safety citizenship behaviors (SCBs) are critical to workplace safety, less is known about the patterns by which team-level safety stressors affect SCBs. Extending work stress theories to the team level, this study employs a multilevel model and aims to assess two unique mediating mechanisms, felt safety responsibility and affective commitment, through which team safety stressors influence proactive and prosocial safety behaviors respectively. Data were collected from 408 construction workers and their supervisors from 28 project teams in China. Results showed that team safety stressors significantly and negatively predicted both types of SCB. Moreover, felt safety responsibility mediated the relationship between team safety stressors and proactive safety behavior, and affective commitment mediated the relationship between team safety stressors and prosocial safety behavior. This study contributes to workplace safety research by highlighting the important role of team safety stressors in predicting SCBs and different mediating mechanisms for the two types of SCB. Based on our findings, practical interventions aiming at improving workplace safety could be targeted at training managers to provide a supportive work environment where safety roles are clearly and consistently communicated, as well as to attend to potential interpersonal conflicts within the work team. These strategies will encourage more SCBs by promoting workers’ understanding of their responsibilities and enhancing their commitment to the organization.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleHow team safety stressors affect proactive and prosocial safety behaviors: Felt safety responsibility and affective commitment as mediators
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume147
dcterms.source.issn0925-7535
dcterms.source.titleSafety Science
dc.date.updated2022-08-29T01:00:12Z
curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law
curtin.contributor.orcidSheng, Zitong [0000-0002-5122-3226]
curtin.contributor.orcidGriffin, Mark [0000-0003-4326-7752]
curtin.contributor.researcheridGriffin, Mark [C-2440-2013] [H-9312-2014]
curtin.identifier.article-number105625
dcterms.source.eissn1879-1042
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridSheng, Zitong [57195553619]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridGriffin, Mark [7403310336]
dc.date.embargoEnd2024-12-26


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record