Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRouse, P.
dc.contributor.authorVeldhuijzen Van Zanten, J.
dc.contributor.authorNtoumanis, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorMetsios, G.
dc.contributor.authorYu, C.
dc.contributor.authorKitas, G.
dc.contributor.authorDuda, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:09:49Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:09:49Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationRouse, P. and Veldhuijzen Van Zanten, J. and Ntoumanis, N. and Metsios, G. and Yu, C. and Kitas, G. and Duda, J. 2015. Measuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 17: 312.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8972
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13075-015-0827-7
dc.description.abstract

Introduction: People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently suffer from compromised physical and psychological health, however, little is known about positive indicators of health, due to a lack of validated outcome measures. This study aims to validate a clinically relevant outcome measure of positive psychological well-being for people with RA. The first study examined the reliability and factorial validity of the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS), whilst study 2 tested the instruments convergent validity. Methods: In study 1, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society members (N = 333; M age = 59.82 years SD = 11.00) completed a postal questionnaire. For study 2, participants (N = 106; M age = 56 years, SD = 12 years) were those recruited to a randomized control trial comparing two physical activity interventions who completed a range of health-related questionnaires. Results: The SVS had a high level of internal consistency (α = .93, Rho = .92). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the uni-dimensional factor structure of the questionnaire among RA patients [χ = 1327 (10), CFI = 1.0, SRMSR = .01 and RMSEA = .00 (.00 - .08)]. Support for the scales convergent validity was revealed by significant (p < .05) relationships, in expected directions, with health related quality of life (r = .59), physical function (r = .58), feelings of fatigue (r = −.70), anxiety (r = −.57) and depression (r = −.73). Conclusions: Results from two studies have provided support for the internal consistency, factorial structure and convergent validity of the Subjective Vitality Scale. Researchers and healthcare providers may employ this clinically relevant, freely available and brief assessment with the confidence that it is a valid and reliable measure of positive psychological well-being for RA patients.

dc.titleMeasuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume17
dcterms.source.startPage312
dcterms.source.endPage312
dcterms.source.titleArthritis Res Ther
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.contributor.orcidNtoumanis, Nikos [0000-0001-7122-3795]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record