Disentangling Taxation Right Rules in Business Taxation: Tracing the Work of International Organisations
Citation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Remarks
Reproduced with permission from the publisher.
This article was first published by Thomson Reuters in the New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy and should be cited as Allen, C., Disentangling Taxation Rights Rules in Business Taxation: Tracing the Work of International Organizations, 2022, 28, NZJTLP, 345. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search
The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase.
This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.au
Collection
Abstract
The international effort to coordinate tax rules across nations began nearly a century ago, originally aimed at eliminating double taxation. The effort was expanded to tax business profits on a more consistent basis worldwide. However, these rules have changed over time without a solid foundation of clear and coherent principles, causing schisms in dealing with multiple taxpaying entities and intragroup transactions. While the Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD) has a large‑scale initiative underway to reset international tax norms to prevent base erosion and profit shifting, the initiative is unlikely to settle the tax challenges of the 21st century since it is likely to create further conceptual distortions. This article tracks the historical development and evolution of international tax rules related to business profits set out by the League of Nations, the Organisation for European Economic Co‑operation (OEEC), the United Nations (UN) and the OECD. The fragmented approach to a narrow set of problems demonstrates that cooperative international tax settlement is far from over. A better alternative for business taxation would begin with removal of the concept of corporate residence, followed by reconceptualisation of base allocation rules to determine the jurisdictions to tax.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fullarton, Lex ; Pinto, Dale (2022)This paper argues that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) practice of issuing opinions and taxation rulings for the guidance of taxation practitioners compiling and submitting taxation returns does not always result ...
-
Fullarton, Lex ; Pinto, Gerardine (2023)Abstract A consequence of droughts, floods, fires, tempests or family disasters is the forced sale or loss of valuable livestock. To add to their troubles receipts arising from those forced disposals is currently considered ...
-
Pinto, Dale (2009)This paper argues that despite the existence of CFC rules, their scope and effectiveness is limited and these limitations are likely to be further exacerbated by business that is conducted over electronic networks, like ...