Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDubey, Anant Aishwarya
dc.contributor.authorHooper-Lewis, Jack
dc.contributor.authorRavi, K.
dc.contributor.authorDhami, Navdeep Kaur
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Abhijit
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-14T04:51:20Z
dc.date.available2023-03-14T04:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationDubey, A.A. and Hooper-Lewis, J. and Ravi, K. and Dhami, N.K. and Mukherjee, A. 2022. Biopolymer-biocement composite treatment for stabilisation of soil against both current and wave erosion. Acta Geotechnica. 17 (12): pp. 5391-5410.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/90915
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11440-022-01536-2
dc.description.abstract

Increased frequency of extreme weather events has made the conservation of riverbanks and coastlines a global concern. Soil stabilisation via microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is one of the most eco-suitable candidates for improving resilience against erosion. In this study, the erosion characteristics of soil treated with various levels of biocementation are investigated. The samples were subjected to hydraulic flow in both tangential and perpendicular directions in a flume to simulate riverbank and coastal situations. Soil mass loss, eroded volume, and cumulative erosion rates of the treated soil against the applied hydraulic energy density have been reported. Post erosion exposure, the residual soil has been assessed for its properties using needle penetration resistance, precipitated calcium carbonate content and microstructure. It was observed that soil erosion declined exponentially with the increase in calcium carbonate content against the perpendicular waves. However, biocementation leads to brittle fracture beyond a threshold, limiting its efficacy, especially against the tangential waves. Additional composite treatment with a biopolymer was found to improve the resilience of the soil specimens against erosion. The composite treatment required half of the quantity of the biocementing reagents in comparison to the equally erosion-resistant plain biocemented sample. Therefore, stoichiometrically the composite treatment is likely to yield 50% lesser ammonia than plain biocement treatment. This investigation unravels a promising soil conservation technique via the composite effect of biocement and biopolymer.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP180100132
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectEngineering, Geological
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectBiocementation
dc.subjectBiopolymers
dc.subjectCoastal erosion
dc.subjectMicrobial induced calcite precipitation (MICP)
dc.subjectRiverbank erosion
dc.subjectINDUCED CALCITE PRECIPITATION
dc.subjectSAND
dc.subjectMICP
dc.titleBiopolymer-biocement composite treatment for stabilisation of soil against both current and wave erosion
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume17
dcterms.source.number12
dcterms.source.startPage5391
dcterms.source.endPage5410
dcterms.source.issn1861-1125
dcterms.source.titleActa Geotechnica
dc.date.updated2023-03-14T04:51:20Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Earth and Planetary Sciences (EPS)
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.contributor.orcidDhami, Navdeep Kaur [0000-0002-6928-0448]
curtin.contributor.orcidDubey, Anant Aishwarya [0000-0002-9890-9583]
curtin.contributor.orcidMukherjee, Abhijit [0000-0001-6972-8962]
dcterms.source.eissn1861-1133
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridDhami, Navdeep Kaur [54683703200]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/