Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Australian Library & Information Studies (ILS) Researchers' ranking of LIS Journals

    133940_133940.pdf (344.0Kb)
    Access Status
    Open access
    Authors
    Smith, Kerry
    Middleton, M.
    Date
    2009
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Smith, Kerry and Middleton, Mike. 2009. Australian Library & Information Studies (ILS) Researchers' ranking of LIS Journals. Australian Library and Information Association. 40 (1): pp. 1-21.
    Source Title
    Australian Library and Information Association
    ISSN
    0004-8623
    Faculty
    Department of Information Studies
    Faculty of Humanities
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9100
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    The paper describes the processes and the outcomes of the ranking of LIS journal titles by Australia's LIS researchers during 2007-8, firstly through the Australian federal government's Research Quality Framework (RQF) process and then its replacement, the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) initiative. The requirement to rank the journals titles used came from discussions held at the RQF panel meeting held in February 2007 in Canberra, Australia. While it was recognised that the Web of Science (formerly ISI) journal impact approach of journal acceptance for measures of research quality and impact might not work for LIS, it was apparent that this model would be the default if no other ranking of journal titles became apparent. Although an increasing number of LIS and related discipline journals were appearing in the Web of Science listed rankings, the number was few and it was thus decided by the Australian LIS research community to undertake the ranking exercise.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • An Updated Ranking of Hospitality and Tourism Journals
      Gursoy, D; Sandstrom, J. (2014)
      This study develops an updated ranking of hospitality and tourism journals by assessing the influence assigned to those journals by researchers in each field. Journals are evaluated utilizing data collected from two groups, ...
    • Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals
      Haddow, Gaby; Genoni, Paul (2010)
      Citation analyses were performed for Australian social science journals to determine the differences between data drawn from Web of Science and Scopus. These data were compared with the tier rankings assigned by disciplinary ...
    • What makes a great journal great in the sciences?: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
      Chang, C.; McAleer, M.; Oxley, Leslie (2011)
      The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.