Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTessema, Gizachew
dc.contributor.authorHåberg, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorMagnus, M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T01:37:02Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T01:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationTessema, G.A. and Håberg, S.E. and Pereira, G. and Magnus, M.C. 2022. The role of intervening pregnancy loss in the association between interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 129 (11): pp. 1853-1861.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93231
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1471-0528.17223
dc.description.abstract

Objective: To investigate whether intervening miscarriages and induced abortions impact the associations between interpregnancy interval after a live birth and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: Norway. Participants: A total of 165 617 births to 143 916 women between 2008 and 2016. Main outcome measures: We estimated adjusted relative risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes using log-binomial regression, first ignoring miscarriages and induced abortions in the interpregnancy interval estimation (conventional interpregnancy interval estimates) and subsequently accounting for intervening miscarriages or induced abortions (correct interpregnancy interval estimates). We then calculated the ratio of the two relative risks (ratio of ratios, RoR) as a measure of the difference. Results: The proportion of short interpregnancy interval (<6 months) was 4.0% in the conventional interpregnancy interval estimate and slightly increased to 4.6% in the correct interpregnancy interval estimate. For interpregnancy interval <6 months, compared with 18–23 months, the RoR was 0.97 for preterm birth (PTB) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–1.13), 0.97 for spontaneous PTB (95% CI 0.80–1.19), 1.00 for small-for-gestational age (95% CI 0.86–1.14), 1.00 for large-for-gestational age (95% CI 0.90–1.10) and 0.99 for pre-eclampsia (95% CI 0.71–1.37). Similarly, conventional and correct interpregnancy intervals yielded associations of similar magnitude between long interpregnancy interval (≥60 months) and the pregnancy outcomes evaluated. Conclusion: Not considering intervening pregnancy loss due to miscarriages or induced abortions, results in negligible difference in the associations between short and long interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Tweetable abstract: Not considering pregnancy loss in interpregnancy interval estimation resulted no meaningful differences in observed risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1099655
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173991
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectObstetrics & Gynecology
dc.subjectinduced abortions
dc.subjectinterpregnancy interval
dc.subjectlarge-for-gestational age
dc.subjectmiscarriages
dc.subjectpre-eclampsia
dc.subjectpreterm birth
dc.subjectsmall-for-gestational age
dc.subjectPERINATAL OUTCOMES
dc.subjectSUBSEQUENT RISK
dc.subjectPRETERM BIRTH
dc.subjectABORTION
dc.subjectREGISTRY
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectinduced abortions
dc.subjectinterpregnancy interval
dc.subjectlarge-for-gestational age
dc.subjectmiscarriages
dc.subjectpre-eclampsia
dc.subjectpreterm birth
dc.subjectsmall-for-gestational age
dc.subjectAbortion, Induced
dc.subjectAbortion, Spontaneous
dc.subjectBirth Intervals
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPregnancy Outcome
dc.subjectPremature Birth
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAbortion, Spontaneous
dc.subjectPremature Birth
dc.subjectPregnancy Outcome
dc.subjectAbortion, Induced
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectBirth Intervals
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectFemale
dc.titleThe role of intervening pregnancy loss in the association between interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume129
dcterms.source.number11
dcterms.source.startPage1853
dcterms.source.endPage1861
dcterms.source.issn1470-0328
dcterms.source.titleBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
dc.date.updated2023-09-07T01:37:01Z
curtin.departmentCurtin School of Population Health
curtin.departmentOffice of the Pro Vice Chancellor Health Sciences
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidPereira, Gavin [0000-0003-3740-8117]
curtin.contributor.orcidTessema, Gizachew [0000-0002-4784-8151]
curtin.contributor.researcheridPereira, Gavin [D-7136-2014]
curtin.contributor.researcheridTessema, Gizachew [J-9235-2018]
dcterms.source.eissn1471-0528
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridPereira, Gavin [35091486200]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/