Quantifying the influence of bias in reproductive and perinatal epidemiology through simulation
Access Status
Date
2021Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Funding and Sponsorship
Collection
Abstract
The application of simulated data in epidemiological studies enables the illustration and quantification of the magnitude of various types of bias commonly found in observational studies. This was a review of the application of simulation methods to the quantification of bias in reproductive and perinatal epidemiology and an assessment of value gained. A search of published studies available in English was conducted in August 2020 using PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. A gray literature search of Google and Google Scholar, and a hand search using the reference lists of included studies was undertaken. Thirty-nine papers were included in this study, covering information (n =14), selection (n = 14), confounding (n = 9), protection (n=1), and attenuation bias (n=1). The methods of simulating data and reporting of results varied, with more recent studies including causal diagrams. Few studies included code for replication. Although there has been an increasing application of simulation in reproductive and perinatal epidemiology since 2015, overall this remains an underexplored area. Further efforts are required to increase knowledge of how the application of simulation can quantify the influence of bias, including improved design, analysis and reporting. This will improve causal interpretation in reproductive and perinatal studies.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Dunne, Jennifer (2023)Perinatal aetiological associations derived from observational data are susceptible to various types of bias. This thesis demonstrated the application of simulation methodologies to quantify the influence of bias in ...
-
Langridge, A.; Nassar, N.; Li, Jianghong; Stanley, F. (2010)Social and racial inequalities in preterm births in Western Australia, 1984 to 2006 1. Amanda T. Langridge1,*, 2. Natasha Nassar1, 3. Jianghong Li2, 4. Fiona J. Stanley1Article first published online: 21 MAY ...
-
White, S.; Eastwood, P.; Straker, Leon; Adams, L.; Newnham, J.; Lye, S.; Pennell, C. (2017)Background: Cohort studies may increase or decrease their selection bias as they progress through time. The Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study has followed 2868 children for over two decades; from fetal ...